So what about the existing AT protocol modems use?
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hayes_AT_command_set [2] https://tmsearch.uspto.gov/search/search-results/73319703
Even though I'm that old, even I don't care even if it was anyway.
...as long as the reason is what it looks like. Rather have Bluesky claim it for the purpose of having the officially recognized legal authority to grant usage to everyone else, than have a rando douche company think they can claim it to extort or simply inhibit everyone else.
Maybe you're thinking of prior art in a trademark? Or trademark genericization? But neither would apply here.
Anyway I don't think that it means that atproto was misnamed or anything, just that this thread isn't the only time people have brought this up.