Once you make the decision to forgo IPC and do things in house, you typically would go the JNI route. Project Panama in JDK 22+ however opens us up to direct memory access at the lowest of levels to shave even more cycles. We get direct, off-heap memory access inside the same process space. This allows us to do some cool things like creating a memory and GPU governor with more direct access to the hardware its controlling, while completely bypassing the Java GC and its overhead! It also allows us to do direct memory copying without ever going through java heap allocations nor primitive array copying.
With this code, I mapped the native C-structs directly to Java objects to bridge the ABI gap cleanly. The naive way to do so, without writing the argus c layer, and interfacing directly with llama.cpp. By having a static, immutable ABI, you save yourself the headache of having to rewrite your entire brittle Panama bindings every time upstream changes a single variable. Then I went a step further and provided the Java API for you directly to interface with!
Idk about you, but if you've ever had to write a JNI wrapper, I much prefer an easy to use clean Java API ready-made.
Then I package everything inside one nice friendly JAR, allowing jvm developers to have access to multi-modal inference with one import.
I’m familiar with enough with Java that I can squint and follow some of it, but I’m hoping to understand more at a macro level before committing to diving into the technical details.
Again, thank you for the information already provided.
Your intuitions are right, faster switching between agent calls, and tighter packing of agents in the same amount of compute space.
There's a second thing besides just efficiency that I provide here however. At a developer-user level, it automagically provides JVM developers (not just java) a frictionless way to add AI into their stack with a single dependency.
It makes using AI in java as easy as it is in python.
I'm providing the [what I've found to be missing] layer for AI in java in the most efficient way I could.
I'm not sure if by user you meant developer (user of this code) or user as in end-user. Let me know if I still haven't answered your question fully yet!