Is there a technical reason that modern cable-Internet bandwidth is asymmetric? My download rates are acceptable for me, and if the upload rates were the same I'd be happy.
Is there a technical reason that modern cable-Internet bandwidth is asymmetric? My download rates are acceptable for me, and if the upload rates were the same I'd be happy.
- There is significantly less spectrum available for upstream channel use than downstream channel use. (Something like 37 MHz vs. 500-800 MHz.) This means cable operators have to be very frugal with upstream channel allocations and can't reasonably bond together enough upstream channels w/ DOCSIS 3.0 to give everyone symmetric up/down speeds.
- Upstream channels are a shared medium using TDMA (time division), which introduces overhead to prevent multiple transmitters (cable modems) from transmitting on top of one another. However, even if your cable modem was the only device on the network, it wouldn't get all of the available upstream timeslots for sending data.
- Upstream channels use a less spectrally efficient modulation scheme than downstream channels in order to keep bit error rates low. (The upstream channels are noisier than the downstream channels.) Given identical channel widths, worse spectral efficiency means fewer bits per symbol means less data sent per time unit.
First, the spectrum allocations were originally driven by the need to deliver video signals that were compatible with analog TVs. Now that TV's are going digital, this might change the requirement for the traditional frequency split for upstream/downstream.
There is no "physical" reason why you couldn't have a 400Mhz upstream range that matches a 400Mhz downstream frequency range. There isn't anything special about coax. It's just RF in a constrained medium.
The former is how Googlers work. I suggest GNU Screen + tramp.
There is a very good reason, so they can get more money out of you to buy the faster/larger service.