Wow, it's unsafe Rust? That seems... like the worst of all worlds.
If nobody knows why the unsafe is required there's no way they'll be able to unwind it. If they can't unwind it then they're in a worse version of C (+ cargo).
If nobody knows why the unsafe is required there's no way they'll be able to unwind it. If they can't unwind it then they're in a worse version of C (+ cargo).
It's practically impossible to write safe Rust when you are calling external libs written in C/C++, like they do for the Javascript engine.
4% is a lot in my world.
The interesting part will be whether they can transform that "mechanical Rust" into something idiomatic. I'm waiting ...