This is an example of a topic that unstructured self study would likely skip. But it is included in every properly structured course because this theorem puts a fundamental explanation to all conserved quantities that occur in classical mechanics.
This is an example of a topic that unstructured self study would likely skip. But it is included in every properly structured course because this theorem puts a fundamental explanation to all conserved quantities that occur in classical mechanics.
https://curtjaimungal.substack.com/p/what-is-energy-actually
Ignoring that, saying "energy must exist because of Noether and time-translation" doesn't really tell what energy actually is, not a very satisfactory response
The nature of energy is really just a result of this property.
The difficulties with energy in GR are related to the fact that those equations alone allow for space-times that are truly bizarre. Some that are technically solutions to the field equations are clearly nonphysical (e.g. Goedel's solutions). There is also a priori no reason why e.g. expanding metrics should actually yield proper conservation of energy.
Interesting.
> This is an example of a topic that unstructured self study would likely skip.
I'm not studying physics – could you take a look at some unstructured reflexions I wrote a couple weeks ago?
I still have a trauma associated with this, though, because it popped out in one exam and I could see the pages in my notes where it was derived but they were quite blank.
e.g. I did formal study of basic physics in an engineering program, but Noether's theorem was never mentioned. I came to that through self-study, and can't really imagine how anyone would miss it unless "self-study" means "read random blogs and watch random youtube videos." I expect even browsing Stack Exchange and Wikipedia would expose you to most core topics fairly quickly.