Strange way to structure an argument. He seems to be arguing in favor of local models, but most of his examples are reasons local models are bad.
Once upon a time that situation got us the whole Free Software movement going.
Why would you expect that third party specifically trained their model to be more aligned to you and your needs than to them and their (business) needs?
That is my point. Why do you think Gemma, a local model trained by Google, is aligned to you and not the values of Google.
You can similarly have a model aligned to you which you pay someone to remotely host for you instead of running it locally.
With local models just because you are providing the compute, that doesn't mean you are the master of the model and it is aligned to your interests. You could just be subsidizing inference for a model aligned to someone else.