Can you please make your substantive points neutrally, without being a jerk? There's no need for the latter, even if you're 100% correct.
I was mostly trying to emphasize the importance of avoiding the negative experiences of people interviewing when the interviewer was wrong about something and won't flex, as exemplified in a couple of comments in this thread:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48839767
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48840261
So to clarify my point in a more general way: We _all_ have some concepts wrong in our head, and we should all strive to be not only graceful but delighted if an interviewee is correct when we're wrong.
(Btw this is an interesting phenomenon - I call it the rebound effect: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...)