Hacker News Reader

Frontier labs are realizing that software/models themselves don’t have real moats and move to embodied ai.

SOTA 80% means a practically useless robot. What are they really imagining their ICP to be here?

What does this comment mean?

It’s unclear to me what their desired outcome for a blog post like this. If you’ve ever worked in a robotics setting, 80% implies that 20% of your autonomous actions are incorrect. Imagine if this were the case for autonomous driving where your car misbehaves 1 in every 5 actions it takes.

Posts like this just reminds me of the end to end demos AV companies built in the early days using a single camera - only to realize that it’s harder than it looks years later into development.

The ICP question was more around the model itself. Are they looking to license it to robotics companies? Do they imagine that devs at robotics companies would be willing to deploy these models as a black box?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com