Then someone vibe codes a barely usable website based on that, and it lands on the HN front page? Is this correct?
Then someone makes a shitty comment. Is that correct?
From my point of view the Jedi are Evil
This page is an LLM prompt response as a list of jpegs with a fake title. You can probably just add "and prepare it as a webpage with image previews for each" ...
I think we can do better than someone shitposting a sentence into openclaw and getting it to the frontpage.
People on here are actually building 100 billion dollar companies, publishing in prestigious journals, maintaining transcontinental infrastructures with global reach... let's hear from them instead of a mac mini going burr for 15 seconds.
More seriously though, in many ways HN is a pretty broad church. You're always going to get a spectrum of opinions, and some portion of people are always going to be particularly forceful about putting forth their opinion. Maybe it's a bad day, maybe it's habit, varies from person to person and day to day, etc.
But I think, if you're posting something to HN (or, really, any large internet forum), negative feedback - and dismissive feedback - is something you need to be prepared for as part and parcel of the experience because it often is going to happen.
Not that I agree with the person you're responding to - their remark struck me as quite a mean-spirited and unnecessary comment, and I very much prefer your perspective.
Anyway, I've bookmarked the site so make of that what you will.
I'm relatively immune to a lot of things, but we're also entering a world where a lot of people can build and might not expect to have potentially millions of people critiquing their work to the level they do.
OK. Let's RFM: first line = "Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes."
So, no, it's not HN-OK for rude & unfounded feedback to make it to the top comment.
Even if the website is "bad" (i.e. those 30 papers were never linked to Ilya etc.), the proper way of handling this is to call it out in a neutral way.
What I'm saying is that in large online forums - regardless of terms of use - some people are unkind, and that it's a good idea to be prepared for that when you post something publicly.
I have no problem that someone had a bad reaction to this and needs to vent, I have a problem that the community deems it the most noteworthy comment and keeps it voted to the very top of the thread.
You would think a university student would understand the importance of citing sources.
If he was really excited he would have put an effort and he wouldn't clickbate submission title.
But alas here we are, perhaps we should give him particpation star for effort.
...who somehow hasn't yet learned the importance of citing sources?
Any and all criticism is deserved.
" rumoured list of papers that Ilya Sutskever gave to John Carmack. "
there is aslo manning book called illya list
close enough imo
any apparently 400 voters too.