In person, I'll hedge of course, it's a natural part of conversing and inviting people to share.
Arguing whether someone is permitted to speak on a subject sounds like it would take as much effort as simply discussing the subject itself.
The author is doing really cool things, like a worker-coop for software engineering:
Also i think the article contained some interesting points. Like the "class consciousness" of the owner-class and how this affects decisions on AI. But, to me, there were more.
Anyway, to each their own. I liked it.
I would not expect a job market "expert" or a historian to be able to predict future world where cumulative machine intelligence is higher than cumulative human intelligence. Why would you?
Don't wish. Just vibecode it for your personal use. Seriously.