Hacker News Reader

Comment by _factor | Hacker News Reader

To what end? I can think of 10 reasons immediately off the top of my head, but it’s far easier to fill existing open source projects with agent contributors for most of them.

Do you really need someone to rhyme out why state actors do what they do?

View on HN

An example would be very interesting and yes explaining what they’re up to would be interesting as well.

Otherwise it sounds like a made up conspiracy theory….

Your accusatory ignorance is not mine to relieve.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils_backdoor

That doesn’t seem to fit the scenario described earlier.

You don’t have to explain anything… that’s your call. A claim with nothing to support it doesn’t change either.

You need to work on your reading comprehension. I am not the parent.

For someone worried about other people being “accusatory” you seem to be that way a lot.

When something is only a few thousand dollars away from us in "the adjacent possible", I hardly think one needs to be a conspiracy theorist to suggest we consider it...?

I don't have the means to research, but certainly there would be ample resources for such an attack in certain spaces??? Manufacturing social signal is hugely valuable

I feel like governments have so many options for hacking that forking open source and dealing with all that is likely more work than whatever outcome they hope for.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com