An SVG is like a cartoon, and throws away a lot of information, a "good SVG" of some subject chosen to be familiar to both animals and humans might look good to one but not the other. The cycling flamingo is a kind of art curation test.

Functional PCB "artwork" is actually not intended for visual consumption, it must meet constraints and advice scattered in documentation, prior "art" in the training corpus, etc.

It doesn't need to be surprising at all

A good static SVG cartoon can be viewed as a multispectral photographic video, with a lot of information thrown away and distorted or oversimplified. Different species will disagree about what information should have been kept vs thrown away. A bee would "complain" it can't see any of the plant's UV markers when presented with plant imagery. Many animals depend on motion or movement to identify predator or prey.

At a certain point culture and personal life experiences start conflicting even within the human subgroup, and we see people argue why this or that flamingo is better than the other.

For circuits then can be simulated. They have a of constraints that might make the problem space a lot smaller. Maybe there are also a lot of text on what makes a good design.

I also believe most design related to a physical object have documentation justifying the choices.