It's the hate language of someone who still has not learned how to use AI.
I use AI everywhere in my workflow and I spend quite a few hour writing and creating the arts.
I use AI everywhere in my workflow and I spend quite a few hour writing and creating the arts.
IMO -- and apparently the opinion of others -- adding an AI-generated picture every single paragraph in your article in which the primary purpose is to, presumably, discuss a topic rather than show off your AI-generated art, is in extremely poor taste. It's distracting, it makes it hard to focus on the text, and to be perfectly blunt, nobody is impressed by your ability to create pictures by AI.
At least they're real art, and he's way better on the Wacom tablet than I am.
Plus rather than boiling off half a dozen loads of laundry's worth of water and electricity, he'll do an hour or so of them on a glass of apple juice and a cheese and ham roll.
It's given a certain limitation to my art style because I can't figure it out at all.
I do respect your opinion, I did that intentionally and I want to keep it as my style. Using images extensively and use metaphorical language::))))
just because you don't know how to swim doesn't mean people can't swim.
Why is it supposed to be good?