> This is not a malicious feature, but it is a weird choice for a developer tool that asks for trust.
They already tell you they scan for malicious prompts, and they have no ZDR guarantees for consumers. Why do signatures like this matter at all?
The n'th comment on some vibe coded app denigrating it for the claude's style. Not even a sophisticated attack to change the narrative. Just Sam Altman jumping on the pile.
From where I'm standing, this started a few months ago when Anthropic decided to gaslight users, sabotage their projects, ship malware and attempt a regulatory capture.
If there's an anti-ANT propaganda, it is solely of ANT's own making.
How could you possibly know that?
You can say there is good reason to be anti-Anthropic but how could you possible know there is 0 propaganda being pushed?
When?
> sabatoge their projects
Again, when?
> attempt a regulatory capture
Yet again, when?
> ship malware
This definitely never happened.
Did you read the thread before posting this? Half of the thread is about how two bits of information used specifically for abuse prevention are objectively not malware - not that it's necessary to point that out to someone with a functioning brain.
> and your username
Profiling - tell-tale sign of someone too stupid to engage in debate and/or who has zero valid points to contribute.
> I'm not going to waste
Yeah, that fools people below the age of...six? Literally everyone else knows that's just how children desperately try to cover for a lack of ability to provide evidence. "Oh, yeah, my dad owns Epic Games, but because you don't believe me, I'm not going to let you meet him!"
I love triggering the OpenAI shills on HN. It's so trivially easy.
Thank you for creating an indelible record for future HN readers about how every single one of your points is completely unfounded and you're merely a propaganda account. Please continue to respond if you just want to provide further evidence of that.