Listeners will likely want to avoid it.

But "creators" pushing AI music won't tag their slop as such because they want to monetize (surprise, they're not doing it for the love of the game).

So this hinges on Tidal being able to reliably identify AI-generated music.

True, though it seems like at least 75% of the traffic on various social media and streaming sites is content that people want to avoid, yet there it is.

I don't agree with the overall point, but what they are saying is that if Tidal makes a "lofi hip hop mix beats" playlist, then they have to pay a nickel to an artist if they direct the user to their song, but NOTHING if they direct to someone who uploaded an AI song. So that's an extra nickel of profit for pointing to the AI song.

In reality, I don't think this is how it'll shake out. But it's a valid argument.