Hacker News Reader

Comment by mkagenius | Hacker News Reader

It looks like the author is specifically avoiding model's name, because results are really weird.

  Opus 4.8/4.7 scored 28%

  Opus 4.6 score 37%

So the author thought as let's not get into that just write Claude.

View on HN

Not weird at all, given the variance in Opus' quality over the last few months.

wild guess - I wouldn't be surprised if Opus 4.6 was run quantized for a while, and 4.7/4.8 have QAT for that nerfed size.

many people think opus 4.6 was the best

Hello! Author here (Katie) Ty for your comments, 4.6 and 4.7 both scored 28% on our benchmark, I just wanted to have 10 things in the list because I wanted a round number.

Where is the weird part?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com