Speaking as a marketer, HN should understand that this is a piece of viral marketing from Lego. It was created by an ad agency, not by good customer service.
Speaking as a marketer, HN should understand that this is a piece of viral marketing from Lego. It was created by an ad agency, not by good customer service.
There are special parts, not that many of them really. A lot of them can be worked around with a little builder's ingenuity. The special parts that are the most annoying are the ones where we have one or two, they're small, and they're somewhere. Not where we're looking, or where we've been looking for the last half hour.
My kids build the kit design once. Then the pieces go into the bins. They'll build it again, in motley color schemes, with adaptations. They'll build boats, cars, towers, trucks, and spaceships. And some things that I can't name, but they can tell you exactly what each piece is for.
And in the last year or so, they've started downloading the instructions for sets that they don't have from the lego site, going through them and figuring out what pieces they don't have and need to work around, and deciding if they can build those items. (This is a 5 and an 8 yr old). At 5, the kid is looking through a set of instructions, identifying pieces, remembering if there is one of them in the thousands of pieces we have, and deciding if it's something that can be worked around. That's pretty good training for engineering.
When I was a kid (and that was during the horrible late nineties and early 2000s, when Lego was all about cramming as many special pieces into their sets as possible – a trend that has reversed by now) I of course needed generic bricks, but even the horrible sets of that time provided them in large enough numbers. What I also loved was repurposing special parts in novel ways. That was always possible, with every part.
My multifunctional super-car obviously needed all the special computer bricks I could get my hands on!
The only thing I never liked where bricks with stickers. Luckily those were and still are rare.
It's an early age manifestation of the hacker ethos - taking some thing and finding all the ways you can use it outside of its original intent, and then putting those disparate things together to build something entirely new.
Legos were much more customizable 15 years ago than today. Here's a comparison: http://betterwrappedinbacon.wordpress.com/2012/03/31/lego-bl...
http://letsbuilditagain.com/instructions/6630/ http://letsbuilditagain.com/instructions/6880/
(To pick 2 completely random examples)
Back in '82 there weren't as many different themes (afaik there were maybe 4: space, town, castle and trains), but the concept definitely existed.
Some might even argue about the gender-neutrality of those themes too: the majority of Lego I owned around that time was the space-themed stuff, and my sister had some of the town sets. In fact, as long ago as 1979 Lego brought out a range called Scala [1] that was targeted almost exclusively at girls (my wife has really fond memories of those sets!)
I don't think they looked hard enough:
http://www.amazon.com/LEGO-Ultimate-Building-Set-Pieces/dp/B...
http://www.amazon.com/LEGO-Bricks-More-Builders-Tomorrow/dp/...
LEGOs gave me the power to use my imagination and creativity to build what I wanted, and this empowered me as a child, and honestly I believe that it also gave me the analytical mindset that has translated over to my programming career.
Boxes of bricks: http://creative.lego.com/en-us/products/Default.aspx#5749
Not sure what the problem with that is. And as others have said, after a week all those legos just go into one pot anyways and mix together to make anything.
You are doing it wrong!
Lemme guess, you've hated Lego since before it was cool to hate Lego?