> Being able to go on vacation with no trouble is massive.
You are unironically using 'vacation destinations' as argument for modifying your legal system to fit foreign lobbying needs. All is lost.
You are unironically using 'vacation destinations' as argument for modifying your legal system to fit foreign lobbying needs. All is lost.
I'm just pointing out that "an organisation something does something bad, therefore it shouldn't exist at all" is a bad argument that ignores the good it does.