Hidden Portals in Earth's Magnetic Field
nasa.gov
nasa.gov
And don't worry, it's winter so the sun's not very hot right now.
We'll also be going at night, so bring flashlights.
Yes, if by "sort of", you mean, "not at all like how science fiction uses the term". What a terrible opening.
This wouldn't be weird if it were some crap news source, but it's kind of surprising that it's coming from NASA.
Can someone explain is there an application where we could utilize this discovery?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interplanetary_Transport_Netwo...
My gut feeling is that a theoretical probe that could use this would have to weigh so little that it wouldn't be worth creating or its size would greatly limit what it could do.
I'd never really thought about the existence of a galactic magnetic field. But when I think about it, why wouldn't it happen?
This is obviously a very direct link between our star's 11-year cycle and our planet's weather. What else is caused by this flow of energetic material? Could this be the source of the stray electrons or cosmic rays that seed clouds in our atmosphere?
It seems to me that the "portals" as they call them are just places where the insulation of the earth's upper atmosphere breaks down and begins to conduct a current. It becomes ionized, a plasma. The fact that these "portals" would then sometimes appear and disappear should then be obvious and predictable to anyone who has ever watched one of those novelty plasma globes.
They would also know that it's pretty much impossible to predict, though.
If the effect is significant it could inform observations on solar activity and climate that were previously missing a plausible theory for connecting them. These 'portals' have the nice property that you can map them with a satellite and you can then correlate those maps with atmospheric effects. That should help us with the models we're using.
But surely lightning strikes must also cause heating? Electric arc discharges on the order of gigajoules and milliseconds [1] works out to a lot of watts. I guess it averages out though because the amount of timespace with no-lightning-strike is much greater than that with lightning-strike.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightning#Harvesting_lightning_...
Same phenomenon. Different scales. And evidently two research groups at NASA who don't talk.