Changing your DNS does basically bupkis for privacy, since they can still read your DNS queries and SNIs.
Encrypted DNS isn't an "any day now", basically every platform and browser and provider supports it, and 100% of my household's DNS requests are opaque to anyone watching the wire. And basically every system like Cloudflare supports ECH, so SNI isn't a thing for the vast majority of sites.
* for the countries/ISPs that don't also hijack all DNS
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNS_hijacking#Manipulation_by_...
The fact that they could perform DPI doesn't change the reality that most ISPs probably aren't doing it, unless mandated by law, because it's expensive and in my main country of residence they can't sell that data to offset the cost.
I'm surprised to see such lack of nuance coming from you.
It's taken a conspicuously long time to even begin to see a solution to the glaring privacy issues with SNI. Even just counting the length of time we've been aware of the problem of SNI being used for censorship and eavesdropping[1], it's over a decade, and ECH's is status is still very experimental in most web server software (and ECH is kind of a janky hack even after how long this has been discussed back and forth, the ESNI debacle, and so on).