The Card That Made the Apple II Serious | Hacker News Reader

The Card That Made the Apple II Serious

wiseowl.com

25 pointsjs212 comments

Open articleView on HN

I hadn't seen the A2FPGA card before. It was briefly discussed on HN a couple years ago:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41237176

You could probably implement the whole Apple II on the FPGA and have LUTs to spare...

Edit: Tang Nano 20K, so fairly powerful, with 64Mbit of DRAM (enough to use as a virtual hard drive.)

I realize it's not an FPGA, but even in 1986 the entire Apple II was already available on a single ASIC:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mega_II

Can get a Sipeed Tang Nano 20K FPGA Development Board from AliExpress for $7.05. I don't know the first thing about working with FPGAs, but this seems like something worth learning someday.

https://6502.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8270

FPGAs are great - it's like writing software to create hardware, magically and on demand.

I wish it were easier to get started with them - the toolchains are usually designed for professional engineers rather than beginners, and the debugging experience is poor vs. any typical software IDE like VSCode or IntelliJ (even though Vivado seems to be based on Eclipse or something.)

But don't let that discourage you - working with FPGAs is incredibly fun once you get over the initial learning curve, and there are many resources available on youtube etc.

I knew before clicking it was the 80 column card.

i had counted on the z80 card instead.

I thought it was going to be Woz's famous Disk II controller.

It is difficult to understate the importance of the Disk II controller. Cassettes were ridiculous. Floppy drives were awesome, especially two of them (which the controller supported).

Kind of the LaserWriter of its time: a very profitable peripheral that made the whole platform work.

Cassettes with automation, the way, say, the Epson HX-20 does, aren't bad - they are slow, but can do random access. That said, the Disk ][ was very much ahead of its time. A bit unfortunate the Apple ][ didn't have any sort of built-in timed interrupts to make the firmware work at higher clock speeds - this locked the II to 1MHz for far too long.

Forget "serious" - games were and are the killer app for personal computing devices.

How many people use Apple II emulators to run VisiCalc, after all?

Games might be the dominant use now, but the Apple II had a lot of business software written for it. I used Publish It to write a newsletter.

What a difference a space makes.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com