Do you have a definition of "smart" such that there is something an AI could do to prove itself intelligent?
Or are you just defining "fast" as something only horses can do, and considering that a useful insight about cars?
Or are you just defining "fast" as something only horses can do, and considering that a useful insight about cars?
There's nothing intelligent about a math processor, even if it's automated.
Do you consider the protagonist of "Memento" to lack intelligence, then?
> Children at school are capable of "discovering" math solutions/methods that are known to others but hasn't been taught to them.
LLMs have already done that one: A chatbot’s result for the 80-year-old “unit distance” conjecture is the first AI proof that would likely be published in math’s top journal if humans had done it alone
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ai-just-solved-an...
> Creativity in new areas without training.
To my knowledge, not something that has ever been done by humans, but again, it depends entirely on how you actually define the goal posts.
> There's nothing intelligent about a math processor, even if it's automated.
There's nothing intelligent about a bag of cells, but here we are.
edit: downvotes but no rebuttals. feel free to show me where the agency, reasoning from first principles, world model etc exists. or you can ask an llm and they'll tell you they don't have those.