I would not attempt to interact with you because of this.
Why not create a fake sender (EG: attacker1,2,3..) per unique account to show individual attempts (keeping the log logic) while protecting your audience`s privacy?
I would not attempt to interact with you because of this.
Why not create a fake sender (EG: attacker1,2,3..) per unique account to show individual attempts (keeping the log logic) while protecting your audience`s privacy?
Maybe this open invitation to the world pushes the boundaries of that definition, but I don’t see where an expectation of privacy comes in here.
> How It Worked
No setup. No registration. Just send an email.
There are no contest rules or terms of service to adhere to, while having corporate sponsors that should be complying with data regulations around the world, while having a prize (which is restricted in some parts of the world).
>Original prize pool: $100 from me + $200 from Corgea + $200 from an anonymous donor + $500 from Abnormal AI (+ $500 API credits)
Definitely a case in keeping all personal details from contestants.. private.
Sometimes you just have to hope it won’t be made public.
Sure, assuming the interests were mine and mine alone if I had entered..
I replied [0] a bit in line with another reply: this is a contest offering prizes with no tos or privacy policy. There is zero benefit for anyone (contestants, the contest or its results, contest owner, registered companies donating to the prize pool) for contest owner to publish partially redacted personal data.