Good thing about the OAuth2/OIDC is these things will not put the trust on the bearer of the api key, but on actual identity that needs to have the access.
> Good thing about the OAuth2/OIDC is these things will not put the trust on the bearer of the api key, but on actual identity that needs to have the access.
And... you do not see the myriad of problems with that? What about the OIDC provider going rogue or getting compromised? How do you ensure whatever you use to authenticate with your OIDC isn't compromised? Many identity providers and identity bearers have terrible security practices. "Add a backup email in case you lose your 2FA. Nevermind it's the same email we use for password reset."
Again, I trust zaptheimpaler to keep their secret much better than this whole pretend security theater.
I've never worked at an organization that handled their user's data/privacy/security even remotely close to how I handle my own and I wouldn't even consider myself all that paranoid. I have worked for some companies that really really should care too - there's just no incentive to really care and those in the org that try too do so will get ignored.
The data breach letters I get in the mail a few times a year back me up on this.
In the end there is always some long lived secret. What changes is just where and how it is stored, secured and used.
I bet we can generalize to say that data shows that you will likely fail to properly secure any secret (including the ones used in OAuth2).
EDIT: An example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37973937
> In the 2025 report, we showed that nearly 70% of credentials confirmed as valid in 2022 were still valid as of January 2025, meaning they have not been rotated or otherwise remediated. When we retested the same dataset in January 2026, the validity rate remained over 64%. That persistence is not a rounding error. It is an operational signal that remediation, not detection, is still the industry’s limiting factor.
> In the end there is always some long lived secret. What changes is just where and how it is stored, secured and used.
Obviously. The point here is to reduce the number of them
Not quite. You shift the trust from the key bearer (the most interested party in all of this) to the identity provider.