Actually, you've provided examples that prove the point. None of those were especially good (though everyone wanted the G4 Cube), and yet they made it to market anyway. Why?
Because the CEO was behind it, breathing down their necks.
Because the CEO was behind it, breathing down their necks.
If you consider that outcome a worthwhile endeavor, I don't know what else to say.
He's talking about an endeavour reaching the market.
I'm sure if Zuckerberg wants to spend $10B on Nuclear Fusion it will happen.
https://www.esgdive.com/news/meta-inks-nuclear-deals-terrapo...
…and if they do all of this, it’ll be closer to $20B than 10!
(Also yes, I'm serious.)
(Doesn’t seem like something to move fast and break things on - change my view?)
Is this a “we can technology our way out of anything” stance?
I'm talking fusion because it's something out there. And in the context of something like the metaverse.
Fission is something you can buy today at retail.
Even my poor country has a Nuclear reactor.
Fission is something you can buy today at retail.
Even my poor country has a Nuclear reactor.