But after you hit like 1000 karma...you just don't care anymore. At least, I've pretty much stopped looking at my karma score.
But after you hit like 1000 karma...you just don't care anymore. At least, I've pretty much stopped looking at my karma score.
Edit: This could be related (someone please correct me if I'm wrong), comments are allowed some time at the top before they "mature."
(let mature (table)
(def delayed (i)
(and (no (mature i!id))
(acomment i)
(or (< (item-age i) (min max-delay* (uvar i!by delay)))
(do (set (mature i!id))
nil)))))Also, PG has made so many unpublished modifications - for obvious reasons - to karma, spam filters, voter-ring detection, I wouldn't put too much stock into sussing out the inner-workings of HN through the original Arc download.
The main point is that it's not instant (i.e. your last comments are not taken into account) and it uses only recent comments, rather than over the life of your account.
>> he sorts automatically to the top of the page. Which then gets him more karma, etc etc.
Patio11 gets high karma for his comments because he consistently posts insightful comments and people (myself included) search out what he had to say:
http://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=patio11Patio is one of my favorite posters, I'm not denigrating him at all. He certainly deserves all the karma he gets.
However, I would think that patio11's, edw519's and others' reputation attract karma more easily than the "regular" commenters. I mean that people are more easily convinced by whatever they say because they trust their reputation.
Why did you care in the first place?
Silly I know, but I also recognize that it is what made me try to write good comments when I first joined HN. Which is exactly what karma should do - make you try to be a better poster.