I landed on just above deficient when tested.
My wife was on kind of same regime, but didn't follow it very strictly. She was deficient, but not extremely.
It was quite surprising, because I got warned when buying 4k unit tabs that they were quite strong and pharmacy clerk suggested taking less.
I tend to have some eczema on my scalp that sun really helps with.
Maybe a lamp that costs the equivalent of a week of holidays in a warm place could be justified after all.
I wonder if taking mushrooms soaked in the sun improves absorption compared to supplements?
The point about letting the mushrooms soak up sunlight to boost their vitamin D content is totally true and absolutely fascinating though!
> When commonly consumed mushroom species are exposed to a source of ultraviolet (UV) radiation, such as sunlight or a UV lamp, they can generate nutritionally relevant amounts of vitamin D. The most common form of vitamin D in mushrooms is D2, with lesser amounts of vitamins D3 and D4, while vitamin D3 is the most common form in animal foods. Although the levels of vitamin D2 in UV-exposed mushrooms may decrease with storage and cooking, if they are consumed before the ‘best-before’ date, vitamin D2 level is likely to remain above 10 μg/100 g fresh weight, which is higher than the level in most vitamin D-containing foods and similar to the daily requirement of vitamin D recommended internationally.
I didn't even know about vit D, didn't research it. I just got a panel done to get an idea of what's going on with me and discovered I was severely deficient on vit D
I have seen neurologists, imunologist, infection diseases specialist, everything is boreliosis qack and even somatic doctor...
Funny thing is before i got sick i spent 3 months on tenerife, so no reason for me to have low vit D. But it was probably depleted by immunity trying to fight the repeated infections.
so yeah, get your vitamin D checked if you feel weak, low on mood or anything out of zen
So, we know the mechanism, and it's quite plausible that supplementation works.
In other words, as an skeptic, I don't think it's just an epidemiological correlation.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7663314/?utm_source...
> the balance of evidence tips pretty clearly in the direction that people with low-ish levels would be wise to supplement
People who are drawing blood and trying to find some correlation between vitamin presence and health at this point are just practicing divination. The fact that it can be published in a scientific journal without any sort of RCT to back it up is palpably unscientific.
The customers of these studies are the supplement companies looking for another product to sell.