> No, KYC has nothing to do with that problem. KYC doesn't help at all here.
that's a bold statement. how does it not help solve the problem? what is a better solution?
that's a bold statement. how does it not help solve the problem? what is a better solution?
How easy would it be for criminal orgs to setup legitimate looking fronts to pass these KYC checks?
How does it? Online KYC is a procedure to verify someone's documents and face. And that's it. What does it have to do with the actual usage of the OpenAI account and the code that is being examined with AI?
the system in place to prevent unauthorized abuse. by default, the guardrails are conservative. to reduce the guardrails you can jump through a progressive series of hoops to establish whether or not you have a valid use case. the entrypoint for establishing your use case is verifying your identity and background. if you don't want to do this, you are free to use Codex Security to identify and fix vulnerabilities, it is quite good at this. the harness and model are already evaluating the usage of the account and the nature of the code being examined and actions requested. but the again, the guardrail thresholds will be very conservative for anonymous users.
what is your proposal?
None. I don't see a solution.
I'm silently rooting for Chinese models here.