You don't have to be local
sivers.org
sivers.org
I'm guilty of the 'let me pick your brain.' And your advice, which is directed to me, is spot on - and I'll take it seriously. But the true wisdom lies in the depths of it: treat everyone like their human. Don't exhaust a man just because he's successful.
So for me personally I enjoy having my brain picked or mentoring someone. Of course, dsivers seemed to go a little overboard with 400 meetings in two years which would be 4 per week roughly. Compare that to the once per month I do it for perspective. To each their own of course.
our website was hacked, and while it gets 200 visits a day (hardly anything), keeping up with orders has been more important than fixing lorem ipsum on the new site.
In person, I rarely meet like minded souls with whom I can have intimate technical discussions, but on-line it's easy (thank you Hacker News friends).
But with customers, I've never found a good substitute for being there with them. I want to see everything they're doing, listen to them bitch, and feel their pain. I want to suffer with them during the day and celebrate with them over beers at night. You just can't do that the same way on-line.
I can get more work done remote, but there's a greater personal connection locally. It's interesting what a consulting gig can turn into.
It is just a matter of personal preference, being very local might be the right thing for other people.
For me, regular in-person contact with friends is essential to feeling motivated and connected with the world. They don't have to be close friends, and they don't need to share my career or understand the work I do as a web developer. Most of the programmer friends I would sling code with on a weekend project are global — scattered across the world. Whereas, many of the friends I hang out with the most locally use feature phones, have old or no computers, and think Twitter is pointless.
But that doesn't matter because what I need them for is to sit down and have a good conversation. Or play a game of table tennis. Or ride our bikes out to the suburbs and back. If I don't get these kinds of outlets, a week spent sitting down and coding leaves me feeling strangely unphysical, unhinged from the world around me.
I've grappled with the local/global issue because my life does feel like a duality, where local (mostly offline) and global (online) are separate. I'm not sure how to resolve that (maybe living somewhere with more early adopters of tech would help). But Derek's solution is an extreme one. You don't have to be exclusively local or global.
If Derek's travel situation is similar, I can see why he wouldn't care too much about having local friends.
Edit: this seems to be the case. From one of his comments below: "Home was the place that I would just work. I was going to so many conferences and such, that all my social time was out of town."
not everything is what you see on tv
Quoting Nassim Taleb : "If someone is a drag on me, I cut them out. If someone lifts me up, I bring them closer. Nobody is sacred here. When the plane is going down, put the oxygen mask on your face first. Family, friends, people I love – I always try to be there for them and help. But I don’t get close to anyone bringing me down. This rule can’t be broken. Energy leaks out of you if someone is draining you. And I never owe anyone an explanation. Explaining is draining."
http://www.jamesaltucher.com/2011/02/how-to-be-the-luckiest-...
That is incredibly selfish. Sometimes the person doing the lifting is the one being "brought down", so you're essentially depending on the fact that people are less selfish than you for this to work. Like anything taken to the extreme, this extreme individualism can only be harmful.
It also avoids the common human-behavior anti-pattern where two people remain in a mutually self destructive relationship because each is under the delusion that the other can't live without them.
There's a difference between supporting someone through their difficulty and someone who is not supporting you, whether that means (consciously or unconsciously) belittling, undermining, or dismissing you or your ideas, or just not meshing well or productively with you.
This isn't exactly a new idea. http://bible.cc/proverbs/27-17.htm
He is talking about the Noble price effect: What happens when people that earn a Nobel price that makes impossible for them to continue working in the field that made them to earn the price, they get invited to so many parties and given so many distinctions and honors and everybody wants to be with you, learn from you or be your friend.
You can help a lot of people in an individual basis this way, locally whenever you go. Those Nobel prices could make millions of people to be interested in science.
Most people can't understand how much of a problem this could be.
I have a natural tendency to prefer to be remote, anyway. But yeah my current situation, amplified by being in a very central social city like Singapore, really amplified it.
Thanks for bringing this up.
The number of companies that I find who are willing to allow remote work are the exception, not the norm. The number who will accept remote people on the business side of things are even lower.
One reason is that there is quite a lot of evidence that, all other things being equal, it's considerably less efficient than co-located teams - see http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4800412 for some references.
Children could be quite global too - Internet and Internet games in particular are appealing for children too.
Coincidental timing for me. I'm Singapore for a few weeks, and even though I've spent months here in the past and have a long-term visa, I have almost no local friends here. I feel like I should feel guilty about it. But I don't feel guilty about it, except in an abstract way.
I spend most of my time coding and working on music. And eating Thai food.
Get acquainted with Malaysian/Singaporean while you're there too.
Shoutout to anyone else here. HN meetup sometime?
I mean, I especially loved the answer based on the idea of "not favoring anyone", when the author was asked about what he did for the local market.
But this requires some "enlightenment" - as the author said, he lived in many places, so he can now relate to human being as equals - wherever they come from or live.
It seems to me it is just wishful thinking to believe most people - or just a significant enough mass - will be able to think like this.
Most people are lost in their own thoughts and community. They just can't think global, and certainly don't want to.
They just care about the ones they know - and cronyism is just an artifact. It's the same story again an again - dozens of people dying is the news, but having a deep cut in your little finger is a tragedy.
For example I'm pretty mixed. I have a lot of local connections and a lot of global ones. I personally feel energised and enthusiastic about both at different times. There have been times when I've been more "local". There have been times when I've been more "global".
In fact I generally get worried when I see statements like this:
One will feel more natural to you. Like your tendency to be an introvert vs extrovert, or conservative vs liberal, these base world-views will shape your preferences for being local-focused or global-focused.
Because - well - they're not true. Some people change. In the long term and the short term. I know folk who've gone left-to-right politically over the years (and vice versa). The introvert/extrovert divide is notoriously context dependent for many people. From my own experience I've been "local" and some points in my live, "global" in others and now very happy getting energy from both.
Not trying to say that any of these groups are better or worse than any other - but there's more than the two extremes. Not everybody stays the same. There isn't a problem with that.
Do what the OP did and try different options. If you don't like it or it doesn't work for you - stop and do something else. But don't just say "I'm local" and set your life course from there on. Things might change. Keep you're eye out for that.
But Derek has been incredible helpful more than once in my life already. He is an example to follow.
Definitely feeling the need to strike a balance.
What I've been struck by is the difficulty in shifting. Maybe I'm not looking in the right places online, but I've found it difficult to make new friends on the internet, or get the same sense of camaraderie as in-person contact.
Anyone have any advice on how to break the ice and make "internet friends" ?