Hacker News Reader

You’re extremely confident about this just based on your experience of it not happening to you. It’s good that it hasn’t driven you into a house but that doesn’t mean it can’t fail in a way that does drive someone else into a house.

View on HN

Well, I’ve seen it very confidently and correctly navigate rural unmarked roads, and drive around rocks and logs across the road and things like this. I find it hard to believe it would drive through a huge stationary object like a house, which I imagine is definitely in the training data.

I guess I’m not saying it’s impossible, but I think at this stage it’s improbable.

The computer does not see things like you see things ;)

The fact that you are saying "but houses are in the training data!" demonstrates your naivete.

Do you think there's some magic going on here?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com