They are Amazon employees, however by making a separate group titled with "Amazon Employees" they are inferring that its a position of the company in question. They are using another entity's name for their own clout. It is not surprising that the group they are leeching clout off of, does not want that to happen and even has the right to go against said leaching.
>And obviously it’s legally permitted, since they had to settle the complaint.
Show me where its legally permitted. Are you referring to the sub linked article here[1]. I found in that article
> By reaching a settlement, Amazon avoids what could have been a potentially lengthy trial, complete with witnesses and a dissection of its treatment of employees. Had the NLRB sided with the employees, Amazon could have been forced to rehire Cunningham and Costa or award them back pay, among other remedies.
It was a settlement that never went to trial. There was no finding of fact on legality. Companies settle all the time for smaller amounts than the cost of a trial. I personally have gotten settlements from companies where we never found which side broke the law but agreed that the settlement amount was good enough to not waste time and money on lawyers.
If you think a settlement means that a legal decision was made, I hope you are never involved in any capacity as a lawyer.
[1]https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/29/amazon-settles-with-employee...