Show HN: FilmBreak is launching a fully integrated virtual film studio
filmbreak.com
filmbreak.com
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/10/business/media/10massify.h... http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/20/business/media/20adco.html http://arstechnica.com/uncategorized/2008/12/first-internet-...
Massify started out as an idea for a viral video site, but after a lot of pivoting turned into a virtual production studio similar to what you are doing with your site.
One of the biggest problem for Massify was monetization. You seem to have the underpinnings of that covered with your distribution channels and your deal with godigital. I wish those things existed when we did (2007) and I wish our CEO at the time had the forethought and leadership to pursue those kinds of deals. That was actually the biggest problem we had (the CEO). He attempted to pivot us in so many different directions when it was apparent that monetization was going to be a hard problem to solve that we all eventually got sick of it and quit on the same day. It also had been 2+ years and I think we were all kind of burnt out (so much so that I refuse to do any kind of web development any more).
Another major problem we had was user acquisition. It's such a niche that I always thought it was silly to concentrate on the number of users and not focus more on getting distribution in place. Of course, I think we were a couple of years ahead of that curve. Had we held on awhile longer, I think we would have been in a prime spot to really make a success of it because we were the only site like that around at the time. We also had a lot of awesome technology sitting in the wings waiting for the non-technical part of the team to do something with it. But, instead, a lot of pivoting and a lot of money burning. So much money burning.
Anyways, love the site and good luck! Looks like you are off to the right start.
http://www.filmbreak.com/projects/framed-baby-photos
Best of luck.
indieintern.com
Hit me at will at that domain and I'll send you a code for free months if you're interested.
Your Twitter updates are a wee bit prolific, though. I'm not sure I'll want to follow one with that activity with fairly little info about the site itself. Maybe split it up into several?
I see a similar thing with other accounts filled with what I call vanity tweets retweeting mentions of themselves.
Have any projects started raising money yet?
If you want to know why Hollywood isn't very innovative, it's because this is what passes for innovation in Hollywood these days.
Here's a movie studio that actually innovated: Pixar.
See if you can spot the difference. "HypeMeter" indeed.
Your stack overflow profile led me to discover what was once called Fohr, which seems to be a company you founded with the hopes of becoming "the next Pixar." Considering you also mentioned Pixar in your comment above, I'm sensing something of an obsession. But regardless, I've decided not to harass you for your bad-taste comment, because I assume it's due mostly to you feeling bitter over the fact that Fohr was not successful, but some other company in the same space might be.
(Full disclosure: I've been kicking around a very similar idea myself, but never got past setting up a landing page: http://www.mediaindie.com/)