Apparently, whether or not the engineers are Chinese is the deciding factor. as long as Nicklas Backstrom is designing the EV, its all good. Or in other words, Chinese scary!
> Chinese scary!
if you have evidence that they have Chinese nationals working as engineers without oversight, you should submit it to the government.
You really think that’s how that conversation would go?
> What part of this would a Tesla, or any other car, not be able to do?
this discussion has reached the limit of its usefulness. if you aren't able to see why having nationals in an adversary nation be in control of dangerous hardware on your soil is a big problem, nothing will aid you in understanding this.
If you've managed to come away from this discussion with the impression that I think it's no big deal to have adversaries in control of dangerous hardware on your soil, then I do have to agree that this discussion has reached the limit of its usefulness, because I said nothing of the kind.
I acknowledged this, you quoted it.
> it really isn't difficult to understand...
Where does 'it' end? Is the subsidiary not operating at the behest of their parent? I need to know when it's safe to no longer be scared.
> Where does 'it' end? Is the subsidiary not operating at the behest of their parent?
and therefore national security focuses on firms which have engineers that are protected thus.