If someone referred to the "previous decade" in 2004, would you have said the same thing?
As the calendar rolled from 1999 to 2000, we entered a new millennium, century, decade, year, day, ...
As the calendar rolled from 1999 to 2000, we entered a new millennium, century, decade, year, day, ...
Every Jan 2 I start saying "last year" and every Dec I say "see you next year"
no, that all happened when we rolled from 2000 to 2001.
smh, even paedants today aren't what they used to be.
I think that's more or less when I lost faith in humanity.
The current year counting was based on the same way years were counted in the past, so you had things like "the 10th year of Caesar's reign". So the year 1 A D. was the first year of Christ's reign.
The year 2000 was the 2000th year of Christ's reign so that's what is celebrated.
Alternatively, you don't really care about that and it's called Common Era now anyway, but in that case it's entirely arbitrary. So either way, calling 2001 the New Millennium is wrong!
The first century is years 1 through 100. Therefore, the second century is years 201 through 300.
The first millenium is years 1 through 1000. Therefore, the second millenium is years 2001 through 3000.
There is no year zero.
The hundredth year of Christ's reign is the year 100.
The thousandth year of Christ's reign is 1000.
The two thousandth year of Christ's reign is 2000.
There is no year zero.