This is an important distinction: what is good for ecology is not necessarily good for economy.
If we need unbounded growth to jeep our economic system to function, its the economic system that is wrong, not nature.
If we need unbounded growth to jeep our economic system to function, its the economic system that is wrong, not nature.
Economies can exist in many different ways. At its core it is just a way to describe how we move resources between ourselves and that can be done in many, many ways.
Like what does "work" constitute?
I know what I'd be using those billions for!! To virtue signal like hell that I was the most nature conservationist billionaire in existence. Not "how can I say this is conservation and monetize it", real conservation with true stewardship of the land. But also that thinking is probably why I'm not a billionaire.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aral_Sea
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster#Environment...