Had I not seen this, I would have been billed out the wazoo. Thank you. How this isn't criminal beats me
I expect there's some weasel words in the contract, but I would expect consumer protection laws (e.g. in Europe) would ultimately favour Oracle's victim/customer.
The same company that, during routine audits, aggressively billed customers for having that feature enabled, even when those customers pleaded, explained, and proved it was an honest mistake and that the feature had never actually been used?
That company is now being accused of doing something illegal?
That company?