But, you know, maybe you're right, if human safety is somehow factored into things then it could work.
But, you know, maybe you're right, if human safety is somehow factored into things then it could work.
Well, it's has been shown in several psychological tests, including parts of the brain that show emotion not firing when shown trafic videos, etc.
With respect to an emotionless AI, the term "psychopath" is out of left field. The term "psychopath" is associated with danger because of certain dangerous human psychopaths. And those people had a whole set of motivations and impulses that wouldn't exist in an emotionless AI.
If you want to argue that an emotionless AI would be dangerous, go ahead, but the term "psychopath" is a poor fit to that case. It brings in too much extra baggage.
Most of them are simple cognitive responses. For instance, if you see a cute puppy you have at least to smile. At the other end of the spectrum we have the intricate web of woman's emotions. Hard to explan, and almost impossible to even grasp. As no one seems to understand this problem well we could leave it out of the specs for now.
[1] http://psychopathyawareness.wordpress.com/2011/02/04/the-psy...