So i guess in the end it just matters how important the work is.
So i guess in the end it just matters how important the work is.
A raw "word for word" translation (which I also tried) made the story somewhat hard to follow and very dry, but just asking it to keep the same kind of jovial swashbuckling tone of the original made something pretty similar to Ellsworth's translation.
Again, before someone decides to "correct" me on this, I am aware that it's very likely that the Ellsworth translations are part of the training set so it's not directly a fair comparison.
Assuming lots of material local to the context one is wanting to translate is included, why couldn't it potentially access that additional context?
What’s the intent and context that a human translator of a text is typically privy to that an LLM is not?