As I implied elsethread, the solution for that is better funding.
Someone needs to take up Carnegie's mantle and finish the job which he began.
Someone needs to take up Carnegie's mantle and finish the job which he began.
What's the limiting principle you propose? It has to be something real libraries and library funding sources can take action on, because they have to take real-world actions on them. So this is not a time for aspirational speeches or vague exhortations to "do more", which is the exact opposite of a limiting principle anyhow. What is "enough"?
As I noted, it's a pain for me to have to drive down to DC to get access to a book which _used_ to be in the local library system, but isn't anymore, or to purchase my own copy (which wasn't previously necessary).
This is a REALLY bold assumption you’re making here, and frankly until we’ve tried it I don’t think you can argue that it has no positive effect to put tons of books in every small town everywhere.
My current library is around 2000 square feet and I acquire around 1000 books a year, so I have to toss around 1000 books a year, because they're made of matter and take up space.
Also along these lines: test prep and study guide books. Same deal really.
https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/SearchResults?ref_=search_f...