HN
Hacker News
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Comment by GiorgioG | Hacker News Reader
Parent
Full thread
GiorgioG
·
For a vast majority of use cases 20TB is positively enormous.
View on HN
mplanchard
·
RDS caps out at 64 TB unless you use Aurora, so 20 TB is totally manageable without sharding.
returningfory2
·
This product is for Postgres deployments that are so large they need to be sharded. For these use cases, I think 20TB is about normal.
jeltz
·
Yes. But for most workloads it is not much for PostgreSQL. You often will not have to shard at all.
tingletech
·
that article seems to suggest 20TB total over the dozen deployments in prod.
happyopossum
·
Sure, but 20TB in “the only database you need” is mere hours or minutes worth of data for many workflows.
Reply on news.ycombinator.com