This article appears to be 100% AI. I guess there's some irony that a company ships an AI feature and someone else uses AI to come up with criticisms of that feature. But the article... doesn't actually say anything?

It's just full of weird, generic short-sentence LLMisms ("Detection is observation.", "Changing the password is authority.", "The security benefit is real.", "That is a meaningful improvement.", "This is not just text generation. It is an agent taking action with a sensitive credential.", ...). It doesn't offer any insights into the actual architecture that Apple came up with, whatever it might be. It doesn't propose a better design, other than a bunch of super-generic things that apply to every single software project ever ("The system should verify the exact website and account before filling or changing anything.", "This feature deserves focused adversarial testing during the beta period."). So... it's upvoted just because the title mentions Apple and AI?