Hacker News Reader

Comment by t1234s | Hacker News Reader

This is probably part of the larger scope of the system wanting to require ID to even boot a computer let alone connect to the internet.

View on HN

More than that, a ban on all general purpose computing.

You can only use specific applications downloaded from walled gardens. You cannot write and execute arbitrary code.

If you are an engineer, all code must be generated via LLM and it passes through some verification through a centralized security and compliance authority on the way to you. You must be fully licensed.

This will be, the end of malware.

There are zero days in every piece of software, but malware is already mostly a state-actor-only thing.

This is a hilarious take

The latest Miasma/Shai-Hulud worm will not run if your development system has KOI8-R (Russian) as the primary language.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KOI8-R

> Kill switch, as always with APT28 malware, is setting the host language to ru_RU.KOI8-R (LANG environment variable). That disables the spread mechanism.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48460507

Note: KOI8-U is Ukrainian and would still trigger the worm/trojan/malware.

So? If I were a US based malware dev that’s what I’d do to avoid detection…

As kooky as I thought he was, Stallman seems to be more prophetic each year. His essay The Right to Read seems to be a vision of how knowledge gets locked down. Every American college/university student has been trapped into renting textbooks. Elsevier and Pearson seem to have used that essay as a roadmap.

https://web.cs.ucdavis.edu/~rogaway/classes/188/materials/st...

I think he's wrong that DRM violates the 4th Amendment, I contend that it is - first and foremost - a violation of the 3rd Amendment.

Yeah. Looks like the future they want is complete marginalization of free computers, of free people. The machines will have to be corporation and government owned in order to network and participate in society. If we own the machine, we're excluded. Ostracized. Even the language they use is disgusting. They say we're "tampering" with the system, as though it wasn't ours to begin with. It makes me really sad that this is what we're heading towards.

The thing about networks is that we can create our own.

The thing about governments is they are just as tyrannical as the corporations. "Any network we cannot surveil and dominate is banned" is absolutely within the realm of possibility.

Then the government would be banning the gathering of people. At that point we're pretty fucked.

Citizens creating informal horizontal networks between themselves is threatening to social harmony, and as more states around the world learn from the highly successful Chinese model, they are unlikely to permit the Wild West à la the old-school internet you are thinking about.

The Mark of the Beast

It is. They want to monitor every second of our lives and put it through current computer systems and salivating on what they can glean from it in future generations of AI. All the bureaucrats and politicians crave is control over everything. No privacy is valued other than their own, and they will always use "think of the children" as an excuse.

> No privacy is valued other than their own, and they will always use "think of the children" as an excuse.

Until they lose an election using "think of the children", they'll always continue to use it. In terms of political weaponry, it's currently unstoppable.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com