There's a lot of layperson-unfriendly words in there! Iterating on that:
"A feature that allows multiple programs on the same device to communicate without the need for an internet connection"
"A feature that allows multiple programs on the same device to communicate without the need for an internet connection"
For a judge trying to rule on a technical case, a poor layperson analogy and lead to a confidently wrong legal conclusion that has serious negative consequences. Thats why court appointed neutral experts are important.
I agree with you by the way, I just don’t think this is one of those cases.