In general if you are new to Stephenson I would recommend reading Snow Crash first otherwise the transition from his other better written books will be jarring.
In general if you are new to Stephenson I would recommend reading Snow Crash first otherwise the transition from his other better written books will be jarring.
https://old.reddit.com/r/mythology/comments/196r7mn/i_just_f...
It's not a bad way to end a book in principle.
I can't actually recall how snowcrash ends, I think I was losing interest by the end.
The second half differs dramatically in tone. If you were really into the specific feeling of the first half, it is very jarring.
I found the whole thing very interesting and enjoyable, but I can imagine being excited for more content similar to the first half and being disappointed by the drastic shift in scale/tone/focus/etc.
I saw the book as two parts:
I: We have a problem, how do we solve it?
II: What are the (very long term) consequences of how we (and possibly others) solved that problem?
From that perspective, it fits pretty well, though yes, the tones of the two parts are decidedly different.
Wouldn't mind hearing from OP on their specific concerns.