Why is it wrong to expect humans (mathematicians) to adapt here? AI is already producing solutions to problems that humans could not find. Culture holds value until it does not.
- AI-generated papers could overwhelm peer-review systems with low-quality work.
- It may become difficult to assign proper credit for discoveries.
- Researchers who choose not to use AI tools could be disadvantaged.
- There are ethical concerns about mathematical work being used to train AI for military and surveillance purposes.
Just like numbers and logic, it isn't and never was reserved only for humans.
They need to adapt.
Music is a human endeavor and musical recordings hurt musicians, bands, orchestras, etc. Especially those starting out.
Mathematics requires substantial creativity at every level. There is problem selection, conjecture formation, proof strategies, definitions, models, and explanations. Yes, it's constrained and guided by logic and rigor but having logic won't give you creativity.
> Music is a human endeavor and musical recordings hurt musicians, bands, orchestras, etc. Especially those starting out.
The medium it is recorded on has no bearing on what composed the music. If people don't get rewarded for composing they won't. Same with mathematics. If people don't get paid for being creative they just won't be creative.
I am not saying I agree with everything in the article. OP of this thread just made a low effort comment that was addressed in lengths during the article.
My point is to say many things have been replaced by technology over the years, but people do them as hobbies.
> Culture holds value until it does not.