Agentic Mfw
agenticmotherfucking.website
agenticmotherfucking.website
Act sarcastic all you want, that's a killer line. You do care.
Gotta hand it to Claude, that's almost a pretty decent line.
I mean, it's still obviously LLM-generated. But Claude's got a sense of humor if you prompt him right.
Its not every day I get called a nobody from a clanker, its true, but I still dont like to be called a nobody.
Fascinating
Made me wonder if there would ever be a copyleft reckoning to this whole thing. Probably not.
Just because this is how things are does not it's how they should be. I'm very tired.
And the LLM came up with some really funny lines
https://dysfunctionalliteracy.com/2019/12/21/why-do-self-hel...
Author has incestual relationship in their family. At least in my country that is highly offensive. For the sake of their possible children / siblinks, I hope they use protection!
Now I want to know in which culture this is used as a common insult.
The english "mother fucker" is born of the original taboo of fucking one's mother. The act is seen as bad, so we use the phrase referencing the act as a label for all sorts of bad things. Like, you dropped a book on your foot, and that's as bad as someone who sleeps with their mum, so you say "mother fucker".
Spanish has tu chinga tu madre or just chinga tu madre.
Not sure off the top of my head, but I know there's lots of other cultures that use the same taboo in the same kind of substitional way.
It's also using only under-specific swearwords like 'm..f*king', which is not really instigating violence, attacking any characteristic directly, just exaggerated profanity to the point of unseriousness.
I'm not saying the style is good or that everyone should tolerate it, I'm saying only that for me the exaggeration softens out the sentiment. I'd argue it's also what you sing up given the URL.
Ya'll should've already realized that finding a truth statement on the internet is a hazard not worth doing.
Now it's just worse because the sloptrolls dont even.
Probably because someone still cared a lot about the bit! And wow this is really quite good lol.
But the site has brilliantly captured the thoughts and the little nuances behind agentic coding. It is sure good for all the LLM providers, but on a slightly serious note, it just burns cash which could have been avoided all together.
All said, it's just too good and satirically correct with the prevailing attitude!
Nothing to complain or comment on about the thought process or content. Just don't get into an opinion forming on what is written, but just take a step back and retrospect, it is all on the wall!
Nice work IMHO!
I’m upset if an LLM actually wrote this because this is p sick
> Now they're slop, agentic, and on fire — but they get attention, and attention is the only metric left.
Welcome to the future, where we have LLMs writing slop rants about LLMs writing slop!
And that my friend was the joke. Achievement unlocked, congrats!
Something that reads like an LLM wrote it is different from an LLM having written it to begin with. Something written by an LLM can be something that doesn't have the hallmarks of LLM all over it.
I was just saying that the original quote doesn't strike me as something that's an annoyingly good piece of LLM writing.
There's a lot of experimentation happening on how to get LLMs to write well, starting with half of what's been posted on Gwern's blog as of late.
As many says if AI does the creative part then I do the dishes, as opposite why we built computers for. Looks like we will be serving AI.
I don't even categorically hate AI. I just wish I could stop fucking hearing about it. These people killed their golden goose (shitty SaaS companies that feed into the giant human centipede of tech stacks that usually just ends up being ad tech at the top) and seem really pumped about it somehow.
We might see this die down a bit when people realize that the real reasons you don't just roll it yourself is that (a) you're paying the company to do it right and to be able to use an economy of scale to do it cheaper than you might even be able to yourself and (b) the real cost is not to build it but to maintain it.
Thank you for your service sir!
I know. It's very difficult nowadays to build a simple HTML page without throwing 15 frameworks in it
Love that one. This LLM is fucking funny.
I know this website is tongue-and-cheek but I did want to address this part. It's seems to be referring to:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47257803
I personally don't see re-implementing a project's specification from tests as theft. I also find it morally okay as long as the re-implementers don't lie about the original project (e.g. saying it's the clone to theirs, the original is X times slower when it's not, etc.). Legally, it would also be permissible since re-implementation of a spec, and even an api interface, has been established to be fair use:
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/04/05/google-oracle-supre...