> Is it?
Given that they've had to change the rules of index funds to allow for this, yes, this is not what people expect.
Given that they've had to change the rules of index funds to allow for this, yes, this is not what people expect.
Also, the rules have changed before. It's not the first time these rules have changed.
I see both sides of the argument (it's definitely _not_ good for 401k investors if Anthropic/OpenAI/SpaceX make huge leaps in technology that allow for far higher earnings that they aren't able to access, for example).
But my main point is that these investors regardless would "only" have 5% exposure to these. That surely cannot be considered a systemic risk that the OP is inferring.
There's nothing special about the number $1T.