I still can't accept to use OLEDs in TVs and computer screens. Both has much higher duty cycles w.r.t. phones and tablets, and I hate burn-in.
My OLED devices fared fine for a lot of years, but I'm not sold on OLED on large surfaces, and a good quality, dynamic backlit LCD is more than enough for my needs.
Either way there's something about OLEDs that my eyes prefer, I cannot verbalize it. Maybe it's placebo :)
When you look at that, there are CNN artifacts in some of the TVs as early as 2 months and 4 months. That's early enough for me.
Yes, screens have improved vastly since the first days, but my life expectancy of these devices is much longer than a ordinary consumer. I don't change a TV every 5 years.
Yes, my duty cycle is much lower than the ones gone through testing, but having one less failure point for my screens is always better. Also, I'm not a nitpicky person about contrast numbers and whatnot. If I enjoy the thing I'm occasionally watching, I'm more than fine.
The 55" Bravia 7II is listed as 2300 Euro. I paid like 1600 Euro for my 55" LG OLED tv a couple of years ago. Of course Sony is generally a more reputable brand (and LG's WebOS sucks) and consumer prices have been going up, but price doesn't seem to be the differentiator here.