> Like, why?
Because everyone, including this forum, is addicted to the instant gratification of LLMs. It’s pure hubris of thinking you can scan the output and it does what you think it does.
Because everyone, including this forum, is addicted to the instant gratification of LLMs. It’s pure hubris of thinking you can scan the output and it does what you think it does.
This is what I personally consider “vibe coding”, not simply using LLMs or agents or whatever in your workflow
It's just another avenue of dopamine addiction, not unlike scrolling TikTok, Reddit, or wherever except vibecoding is disguised as being productive.
Your workflow is similar to mine, and not "agentic". The proponents of Agentic workflows would have you handover the bulk of the edits to AI, and you'd hand-hold/course-corrrect its approach via chat while it does the thinking.
I tried the agentic approach for code-gen once, and found it mentally draining. Its like pairing with an over-enthusiastic junior on cocaine that can also type 2000 wpm.
Chunking small changes is great because you don't need the latest and greatest models, Flash variants are more than enough.
Deploying and watching CI and looping until it passes.