It’s not like anyone owes Sam Altman their business just bc their product has become slightly, perhaps temporarily, better
They have no values that align with humans prospering.
If someone just uses normal claude to make killer robots, i dont think thats on anthropic, that on the legal and regulatory system to step in and stop that
https://investors.palantir.com/news-details/2024/Anthropic-a...
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/12/karp-palantir-anthropic-clau...
https://www.reuters.com/technology/palantir-faces-challenge-...
Any company of Palantir size is not just gonna have people using personal subscriptions to use Claude on mission critical software or it's development.
Because the Anthropic's presentation of their position doesn't have a domestic or foreign caveat to autonomous weapons. It's a categorical no.
Your link
I was asking about autonomous weapons.
>> Both companies don't mind weaponization. The difference is whether it should only be domestic. Both are ok with foreigners being bombed.
Google put up so little of a fight against the DoW for their use of Gemini that we didn't even hear about it. They are clearly the worst of the evils here, but OpenAI is the one getting all of the negative press.